<?xml version="1.0"?>

<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>TraditionalMass.org Articles</title>
		<link>http://www.traditionalmass.org/</link>
		<description>The Light of Faith is Still Burning</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:40:17 -0700</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:40:17 -0700</lastBuildDate>
		<managingEditor>info@traditionalmass.org</managingEditor>
	  
	  
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Traditionalists, Infallibility and the Pope]]></title>
			<link>http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=103</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A clear and concise survey of the sedevacantist argument, based on the teachings of pre-Vatican II canonists, dogmatic theologians and popes. First published in 1995 as a booklet, and revised in 2006 to address various objections, Traditionalists, Infallibility and the Pope has enjoyed a world-wide circulation. Despite its continuing popularity, it is the one major treatise on sedevacantism that the Society of St. Pius X has never even attempted to answer. We are happy to make it available here on-line for the first time in its 2006 edition.]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
			<author>info@traditionalmass.org (Rev. Anthony Cekada)</author>
			<guid>http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=103</guid>
		</item>

	  
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Modernism Resurrected: Benedict XVI on the Resurrection]]></title>
			<link>http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=102</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The Resurrection: Not the resuscitation of a corpse? An "evolutionary" leap? Not a historical event like Our Lord's birth or crucifixion? St. Luke "contradicts" himself? How Benedict XVI's new book Jesus of Nazareth resurrects modernist teachings condemned by St. Pius X — and in the process destroys Christ's principal miracle, His Resurrection. (MHT Newsletter, April 2011)]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
			<author>info@traditionalmass.org (Most Rev. Donald J. Sanborn)</author>
			<guid>http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=102</guid>
		</item>

	  
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Benedict Approves Contraception]]></title>
			<link>http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=101</link>
			<description><![CDATA[An in-depth analysis of Benedict XVI's statement on condoms and of the reaction to it conservative Catholic circles. (Most Holy Trinity Seminary Newsletter, January 2011)]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
			<author>info@traditionalmass.org (Most Rev. Donald J. Sanborn)</author>
			<guid>http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=101</guid>
		</item>

	  
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sacramental Intention and Masonic Bishops]]></title>
			<link>http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=100</link>
			<description><![CDATA[An old canard about Abp. Lefebvre's ordination. (Letter. August 2003)]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
			<author>info@traditionalmass.org (Rev. Anthony Cekada)</author>
			<guid>http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=100</guid>
		</item>

	  
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Here Comes the Bride: The Music Starts Again for the SSPX]]></title>
			<link>http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=99</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A critical analysis of the letters of Bishop Williamson, Benedict XVI and Bishop Fellay on the possibility of an SSPX "reconciliation." Bishop Williamson calls his statement on the Jews "an opinion." Ratzinger offers SSPX an ecumenical olive branch to enable them to "move beyond one-sided positions," and break down "rigidities, so that positive energies could emerge for the whole." Bp Fellay wants to consider Vatican II "in light of tradition" and speaks of "debates" with the Vatican, but what new meaning will he "discover" for its heresies after all these years? Bishop Williamson seems to opt for silence instead of savaging Vatican II. Prediction for the SSPX/Modernist marriage: Start up the music again. (MHT Seminary Newsletter, April 2009)]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
			<author>info@traditionalmass.org (Most Rev. Donald J. Sanborn)</author>
			<guid>http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=99</guid>
		</item>

	  
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Logical Chickens Coming Home to Roost:
A Commentary on Recent Events in SSPX]]></title>
			<link>http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=98</link>
			<description><![CDATA[(1) Review of the positions of SSPX. Recognize and resist. Endless contradictions. Basic principle: WWLD &#151; what would Lefebvre do? (2) Ratzinger (Benedict XVI). The ecumenist, desperate for a deal. (3) Bp. Fellay, the theological disaster. Fudging on religious liberty, adopting Frankechurch terminology, and discovering his Jewish "elder brothers." (4) Bp. Williamson, the star of the show. A diversion from the real problem. His views on Jews a "surprise"? Secularist hypocrisy on "free speech." (5) Outlook for SSPX. Predictions: Bp. Williamson will recant. Bp. Fellay will do the deal. SSPX will experience no significant exodus. (!)  (MHT Seminary Newsletter, February 2009)]]></description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
			<author>info@traditionalmass.org (Most Rev. Donald J. Sanborn)</author>
			<guid>http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=98</guid>
		</item>

	  
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Should I Assist at a Mass that Names Benedict XVI in the Canon?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=97</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The problem of una cum traditional Latin Masses&#151;those at which the priest mentions Benedict XVI as "our pope" during the first prayer of the Canon. (1) What does the prayer for the pope mean? (2) Can't I "withhold consent" from it? (3) What's wrong with participating in it?. (4) Objections and responses. A resum&eacute; of Fr. Cekada's longer theological study, "The Grain of Incense." (Pamphlet, November 2008)]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
			<author>info@traditionalmass.org (Rev. Anthony Cekada)</author>
			<guid>http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=97</guid>
		</item>

	  
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Nine vs. Lefebvre: We Resist You to Your Face]]></title>
			<link>http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=96</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The history of our court battle (1983-1987) with Abp. Marcel Lefebvre and the Society of St. Pius X. (1) Contributing Factors: The mentality of the Nine. Abp. Lefebvre's change of course after the death of his great enemy, Paul VI, and his negotiations with "Rome". What kind of organization is SSPX, anyway? Shifting policies on property. (2) Theological Issues: Abp. Lefebvre allows doubtfully-ordained priests to work in SSPX. The John XXIII (Bugnini) Missal. Summary expulsions of priests.  SSPX as substitute magisterium. Loyalty to the "positions" of Abp. Lefebvre above all. Acceptance of phony annulments. (3) The April 1983 Break: Fr. Sanborn's removal. The April 27 showdown with Abp. Lefebvre and the expulsions. (4) The Lawsuits. A multi-front battle. (5) The Settlement. The "silver bullet." Settlement negotiations. SSPX takes a buyout &#151; and gets stung by its own paranoia. (6) Effects of the Suits. For SSPX: America under foreign masters, loyalty oaths, the Nine as boogey-men, pastoral setbacks. Subsequent apostolate of the Nine: theological studies, other bishops, seminaries, contacts with other clergy. America as a "sedevacantist bastion." (PDF, Internet, October 2008)]]></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
			<author>info@traditionalmass.org (Rev. Anthony Cekada)</author>
			<guid>http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=96</guid>
		</item>

	  
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Genuflecting to the Jews]]></title>
			<link>http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=95</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ratzinger alters the Good Friday prayer in the 1962 Missal for the conversion of the Jews. What's next? The Breviary? St. Paul? (MHT Seminary Newsletter, March 2008)]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
			<author>info@traditionalmass.org (Most Rev. Donald J. Sanborn)</author>
			<guid>http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=95</guid>
		</item>

	  
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Grain of Incense: Sedevacantists and Una Cum Masses.]]></title>
			<link>http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=94</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Should we assist at traditional Masses offered "together with Thy servant Benedict, our Pope"? (1) The linguistic and theological meanings for the prayer for the pope in the Canon. (2) How you actively participate in that prayer. (3) Why it is wrong for you to do so. A major study, based on liturgical commentaries, moral theology, canon law, Vatican decrees and papal pronouncements. (Monograph, November 2007)]]></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
			<author>info@traditionalmass.org (Rev. Anthony Cekada)</author>
			<guid>http://www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.php?id=94</guid>
		</item>

		
		
	</channel>
</rss>